<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Behind The Scenes of The DPG&#8217;s Ethics Complaint Against My Good Friend, Speaker Glenn Richardson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://politicalvine.com/politicalrumors/rumors/behind-the-scenes-of-the-dpgs-ethics-complaint-against-my-good-friend-speaker-glenn-richardson/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://politicalvine.com/politicalrumors/rumors/behind-the-scenes-of-the-dpgs-ethics-complaint-against-my-good-friend-speaker-glenn-richardson/</link>
	<description>The Political Vine is the home of political news, satire, rants, and rumors.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 16:14:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mad Dog</title>
		<link>http://politicalvine.com/politicalrumors/rumors/behind-the-scenes-of-the-dpgs-ethics-complaint-against-my-good-friend-speaker-glenn-richardson/comment-page-1/#comment-8380</link>
		<dc:creator>Mad Dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 15:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalvine.com/politicalrumors/rumors/behind-the-scenes-of-the-dpgs-ethics-complaint-against-my-good-friend-speaker-glenn-richardson/#comment-8380</guid>
		<description>Rule No. 3

&quot;Abstinence. Just say No.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rule No. 3</p>
<p>&#8220;Abstinence. Just say No.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mad Dog</title>
		<link>http://politicalvine.com/politicalrumors/rumors/behind-the-scenes-of-the-dpgs-ethics-complaint-against-my-good-friend-speaker-glenn-richardson/comment-page-1/#comment-8379</link>
		<dc:creator>Mad Dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 15:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalvine.com/politicalrumors/rumors/behind-the-scenes-of-the-dpgs-ethics-complaint-against-my-good-friend-speaker-glenn-richardson/#comment-8379</guid>
		<description>Rule No. 2

&quot;Don&#039;t ask. Don&#039;t tell.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rule No. 2</p>
<p>&#8220;Don&#8217;t ask. Don&#8217;t tell.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mad Dog</title>
		<link>http://politicalvine.com/politicalrumors/rumors/behind-the-scenes-of-the-dpgs-ethics-complaint-against-my-good-friend-speaker-glenn-richardson/comment-page-1/#comment-8378</link>
		<dc:creator>Mad Dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 15:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalvine.com/politicalrumors/rumors/behind-the-scenes-of-the-dpgs-ethics-complaint-against-my-good-friend-speaker-glenn-richardson/#comment-8378</guid>
		<description>Rule No. 1

&quot;If the trailers rocking, don&#039;t come knocking.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rule No. 1</p>
<p>&#8220;If the trailers rocking, don&#8217;t come knocking.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Simon</title>
		<link>http://politicalvine.com/politicalrumors/rumors/behind-the-scenes-of-the-dpgs-ethics-complaint-against-my-good-friend-speaker-glenn-richardson/comment-page-1/#comment-8232</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 13:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalvine.com/politicalrumors/rumors/behind-the-scenes-of-the-dpgs-ethics-complaint-against-my-good-friend-speaker-glenn-richardson/#comment-8232</guid>
		<description>Please, let&#039;s NOT follow the example of the Atlanta Police Department and just bursting in with no knock and firing questions/depositions at someone based on the POSSIBILITY that someone is just making-up a political story in order to gain a political point.

The Ethics Commission deals in rules of evidence in order to open an investigation; so should the Joint Legislative Committee on Ethics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please, let&#8217;s NOT follow the example of the Atlanta Police Department and just bursting in with no knock and firing questions/depositions at someone based on the POSSIBILITY that someone is just making-up a political story in order to gain a political point.</p>
<p>The Ethics Commission deals in rules of evidence in order to open an investigation; so should the Joint Legislative Committee on Ethics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nune of Debove</title>
		<link>http://politicalvine.com/politicalrumors/rumors/behind-the-scenes-of-the-dpgs-ethics-complaint-against-my-good-friend-speaker-glenn-richardson/comment-page-1/#comment-8217</link>
		<dc:creator>Nune of Debove</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 02:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalvine.com/politicalrumors/rumors/behind-the-scenes-of-the-dpgs-ethics-complaint-against-my-good-friend-speaker-glenn-richardson/#comment-8217</guid>
		<description>Bill,

Sort of like reporting murder just because there&#039;s a lot of blood on the floor?

I&#039;d hate to think the burden of proof would say ... fall on O.J. Simpson ... to get the murder of Niccole investigated?

He&#039;d have to file a report with photographs, tissue samples from the body, a certified copy of birth records, photo ID of Niccole, avadavats from a doctor that the death was not natural, notes from three members of the clergy to back up that it was not the very hand of God that slit her throat open?

So if it is common knowledge, we still need to meet a laborious technical standard that sex with a lobbyist violates some codified standard of behavior?

I could be crude and say her sexual favors were not worth the $50 minimum gift reporting standard?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill,</p>
<p>Sort of like reporting murder just because there&#8217;s a lot of blood on the floor?</p>
<p>I&#8217;d hate to think the burden of proof would say &#8230; fall on O.J. Simpson &#8230; to get the murder of Niccole investigated?</p>
<p>He&#8217;d have to file a report with photographs, tissue samples from the body, a certified copy of birth records, photo ID of Niccole, avadavats from a doctor that the death was not natural, notes from three members of the clergy to back up that it was not the very hand of God that slit her throat open?</p>
<p>So if it is common knowledge, we still need to meet a laborious technical standard that sex with a lobbyist violates some codified standard of behavior?</p>
<p>I could be crude and say her sexual favors were not worth the $50 minimum gift reporting standard?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

