Comments on: Mike Wiggins: Looking More and More Like The Scumbag He First Appeared To Be…

By: Judy

Judy — Wed, 01 Nov 2006 21:58:31 +0000

>I do not believe that a twenty year old family squabble should be part of a campaign.

BS. I ABSOLUTELY want to know about the demeanor and disposition of a person running for the position of JUDGE. Someone who is incapable of negotiating with his own flesh & blood is hardly, IMO, a qualified candidate to handle Supreme Court decisions affecting other peoples’ lives.

The affidavit was signed in 1999 by his sister… hardly 20 years ago.

All is fair in love and war. Candidates’ past history is an open book when they run for PUBLIC office.

By: Josh

Josh — Wed, 01 Nov 2006 19:21:17 +0000

Bill,
Have you read this. Look this was a personal family matter. There were no crimes, the guy has passed a number of security clearances.

My issue is that she went after a very personal family dispute. I think she could have beat him on qualifications alone.

I will admit that I hold a judge to a different standard when it comes o a political campaign that anyone else running for office. Having said that I still would have been pissed if a candidate did this to another candidate.

By: Bill Simon

Bill Simon — Wed, 01 Nov 2006 13:40:22 +0000

But, Josh, it doesn’t matter…legal proceedings are legal proceedings.

And, in the context of a race for the Supreme Court of Georgia, past court cases are as valid for him as they are for Hunstein.

Or, do you think he has immunity?

By: Josh

Josh — Wed, 01 Nov 2006 11:35:35 +0000

I do not believe that a twenty year old family squabble should be part of a campaign. I think Hunstein was wrong to bring this out, and that it was out of bounds. We do not truely know what transpired 20 years ago, and quite frankly I don;t care, as it seems like it was a very tough time for the Wiggins family.

By: John Konop

John Konop — Tue, 31 Oct 2006 20:31:44 +0000

Josh

Paging Josh……………