<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Politics of Meaning - Part 1008</title>
	<link>http://politicalvine.com/politicalrumors/rumors/the-politics-of-meaning-part-1008/</link>
	<description>The Political Vine is the home of political news, satire, rants, and rumors.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 02:47:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Charley Levinson</title>
		<link>http://politicalvine.com/politicalrumors/rumors/the-politics-of-meaning-part-1008/#comment-10569</link>
		<dc:creator>Charley Levinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 10:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://politicalvine.com/politicalrumors/rumors/the-politics-of-meaning-part-1008/#comment-10569</guid>
		<description>There is nothing conclusive to suggest that the egregiously misnamed "FairTax" would collect more revenue, particularly at a 23% rate.  Some studies put the revenue neutrality point at a 44% national sales tax rate.  My problem with it is that it shifts even more of the tax burden onto the working class, "rebates" notwithstanding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is nothing conclusive to suggest that the egregiously misnamed &#8220;FairTax&#8221; would collect more revenue, particularly at a 23% rate.  Some studies put the revenue neutrality point at a 44% national sales tax rate.  My problem with it is that it shifts even more of the tax burden onto the working class, &#8220;rebates&#8221; notwithstanding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
