Jews With Guns On Alert For Dumb-Ass Driving Red Pick-Up Truck In Sandy Springs
by Bill Simon
First, read this article, then we can discuss.
In response to Sherry Frank, executive director of the American Jewish Committee, who stated in the article that “…no matter how much anti-Semitism and bigotry is reduced, you’ll never wipeout prejudice,” she is right…but, it IS possible to wipe-out the humans who practice it with regularity.
Note to Dumbass Mother-F***er driving red pickup in Sandy Springs, and using it to harrass Jews walking home from services at synagogue, I just hope to have the opportunity to allow you to discover if there is a Heaven or a Hell.
May 24th, 2006 at 3:15 pm
Amazing how stupid and ignorant people are.
I’m not sure that I agree with the “opportunity to allow…” comment though. Vigilantes aren’t my gig.
May 24th, 2006 at 10:03 pm
I understand, Sam. Let me ask you: Were you in favor of America going over to Afghanistan to kick some ass on the Taliban after 9-11? THAT is a form of “vigilantism”, isn’t it?
May 25th, 2006 at 6:47 am
Bill,
Your kidding right. Remember 9/11. How many people died that day. Your talking about taking someone out for harassment. I think the harassment is terrible, but heaven or hell…
May 25th, 2006 at 9:31 am
Bill, I love you. I really do.
May 25th, 2006 at 12:27 pm
I like this approach, I understand it’s not long term – but it does highlight the issue
http://www.ajc.com/metro/content/shared-blogs/ajc/politicalinsider/entries/2006/05/25/a_gentile_call_for_a_synagogue.html
May 25th, 2006 at 5:11 pm
Wow, are the yahoos now thriving in Sandy Springs? Now I know why a friend of mine who is Jewish is afraid to put the menorah in her front window. She lives in Cherokee county.
May 25th, 2006 at 11:15 pm
Sam, Sam, Sam, Sam…do you understand that the Rule of Law and the Rule of Precedent should never be concerned with the “size/scope” of an act of malfeasance to justify an opposite reaction?
It doesn’t matter how many people died on 9-11 to justify going over to Afghanistan to kick the living sh*t out of a bunch of people who deserved to have the living sh*t kicked out of them, does it?
I believe in the Rule of Vigilantisim and wholeheartedly support the military action in Afghanistan.
I’m not one of these people who sits around “forgiving” my enemies…my enemies deserve to be served a lesson.
D*ckhead with a red pickup truck in Sandy Springs deserves, as far as I’m concerned, to either have the living sh*t kicked out of him, or to simply cease to breathe air.
Either way, I can assure you, at least 2 good things will result: 1) A certain group of innocent people in Sandy Springs will feel safe(r), and 2) All the other dumb*sses who previously had ANY inkling of doing the exact same thing as this clown, will likely STOP themselves from carrying out their secret desire.
Whether this guy is “harrassing” (as you euphemistically define a truck running someone off the sidewalk they are walking on) or “intimidating” people in a certain segment of the population (be it a woman, a Jewish person, a black person, a Hispanic person or whatever) that THEY don’t think deserves to live a peaceful life…yeah, I wouldn’t shed a tear if they ceased to exist…NOR would I think the effect on society would be to harm it.
Nay, in fact, I think it would help improve society greatly if people knew they were going to get their as-es kicked for doing these types of activities. Because, they certainly don’t know any better based on what the Bible and the fear of God should have taught them.
BUT, I’m an Old Testament kind of guy…eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth, etc….and, in a state full of religious zealots who would rather spend their time thumping a Bible about gays, I realize I’m in the minority on all sorts of levels of Biblical theory.
May 26th, 2006 at 9:06 am
Steph…I’m not quite sure how to take that love in this case…is it a sarcastic “I love you” or a “You go, Bill!” type of “I love you?” 🙂
May 26th, 2006 at 11:02 am
It is more of a You Go Bill type of love. I still think you are a bitter old man.
🙂
May 26th, 2006 at 11:17 am
The guy who did this is some ignoramus who woke up in his own vomit the next day.
May 26th, 2006 at 9:05 pm
Bill,
We’ll agree to disagree on the Rule of Vigilantism issue.
We agree that there a some number of a..holes that are doing stupid things, that need to be stopped. There are numerous ways to do that.
I wish that I could have been there this evening to support the people as the walked home in peace. I hope that the idiots who attacked these people are caught and brought to justice!
May 27th, 2006 at 10:41 am
Fine, Sam, then, if you wish to be considered CONSISTENT, then you must, apparently, disagree with what America did to Afghanistan after 9-11.
May 27th, 2006 at 3:33 pm
Bill Simon Says:
{I’m an Old Testament kind of guy…eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth, etc….}
Bill, perhaps you should become a New Testament kind of guy.
Matthew 5-38 “You have heard that it was said, ‘Eye for eye, and tooth for tooth.'[a] 39But I tell you, Do not resist an evil person. If someone strikes you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also.
That doesn’t sound like an endorsement of an eye for and eye philosophy.
LM
May 27th, 2006 at 9:33 pm
Bill,
I don’t think it’s inconsistent at all.
We did the right thing in Afghanistan.
I do believe what happened to the folks walking home is wrong, very wrong. No-one was killed, it was not a well planned terrorist attack.
May 28th, 2006 at 9:34 am
Sooooooo…we should wait until they are successful before they should have the living sh*t kicked out of them?
In that case, by that logic, we should have waited until Saddam was successful in carrying out an attack on us, right?
You see, Sam, you are concerned about “scale.” I am concerned only about what is in their heart to motivate them. This madman with a pick-up truck is only a mini-Saddam as far as I’m concerned. Better to uproot the weed now, lest it be allowed to takeover a larger area. THAT was the logic in taking-out Saddam.
May 28th, 2006 at 9:38 am
Lynn,
There’s a religious reason why I stick with the Old Testament. Can you guess why that would be?
FURTHERMORE, based on your quote in Matthew, that should have been what President Bush should have done when we were attacked on 9-11, RIGHT? We, as a countery, should have just turned the other cheek, right?
May 28th, 2006 at 4:30 pm
{There’s a religious reason why I stick with the Old Testament. Can you guess why that would be?}
Because you are Jewish. Thats an easy one.
Lynn
May 28th, 2006 at 7:06 pm
Very, very, very good, Lynn. So, you can see why “turning the other cheek” cannot/does not/will never work for me.
But, what you have to explain is how you can support the U.S. attacking Afghanistan and Iraq, if YOU believe in the New Testament and the Book of Matthew, right?
May 28th, 2006 at 9:04 pm
{But, what you have to explain is how you can support the U.S. attacking Afghanistan and Iraq,}
When did I ever say I did support that?
Lynn
May 28th, 2006 at 10:45 pm
Just like you assumed I should remember/follow the Book of Matthew, I presumed you supported our President in every endeavor of his presidency…no?
June 4th, 2006 at 5:50 pm
If he attacks with potential deadly force/weapon (truck) defend yourself.
June 5th, 2006 at 11:31 pm
Matthew 24 supports that Jesus knew that there would always be wars and rumors of war. Jesus is with every God fearing Christian on the battlefield!