Ralph Reed: Guilty of Bribery
by Bill Simon
According to a FOX News survey of Americans, 44% think their members of congress have taken bribes. Bribes not only from people like Jack Abramoff, but bribes from all types of well-heeled “special interests” people and groups.
But, I would contend that bribes don’t just happen at the elected level. According to Dictionary.com, the primary definition of a bribe is this: Something, such as money or a favor, offered or given to a person in a position of trust to influence that person’s views or conduct.
So, in the matter of my favorite live horse to beat (i.e., Ralph Reed), it doesn’t matter that he “hasn’t been charged with anything”, or so as every newswriter likes to insert in every story they write about Ralph Reed.
What matters is, Ralph Reed took a bribe of $4.1 million+ in Indian gambling money to manipulate other Christian conservatives into thinking it was a worthwhile cause to fight against the Alabama lottery, new casinos in Louisiana, and any other threat to his ultimate client (that being an Indian tribe that wanted to protect its territory in the gambling arena). Unbeknownst to them, all they were doing was wiping-out competition in favor of (pretty much) granting a monopoly to one tribe’s business interests.
Jack Abramoff DID NOT have those kinds of connections in Alabama to make that laundering operation work…it was all developed by little Ralphie Poo…whose religious principles and integrity can be bought for money. And, this is the guy who thinks he should be elected Lt. Governor of Georgia?
Thanks, but, I’ll pass on electing anyone to public office whose principles and integrity can be compromised so easily.
January 15th, 2006 at 7:56 pm
Um, does the Category Name “Political Boxers” refer to those caught with their pants down? or to something else? Judging by the article contents I think I might be right.
January 15th, 2006 at 8:49 pm
Well…actually…I invented “Political Boxers” as a play on “Political Briefs” (which is what a lot of other newsletters and newspapers use to report political stories in their publications).
The “Boxers” actually connotes bare-knuckled boxing in the political arena, rather than what you thought. But, if you want, you can think about it that way if you don’t like the violent connotations with “boxing” someone… 🙂
January 15th, 2006 at 8:54 pm
Heh. I’m happy with the bareknuckle connotation. You haven’t SEEN bribery until you’ve lived in Utah….
January 15th, 2006 at 8:58 pm
Utah? The land of Mormons? No way!
January 16th, 2006 at 12:09 pm
Oh yes…. after all, this is the state wherein a number of Olympic Committee folks were convicted for bribery, remember?
Love Today’s Deep Tho’t, btw!