Senator Johnny Isakson Responds To The Misinformation On The Immigration Bill
by Bill Simon
I’ve received the following information sent out by Senator Johnny Isakson’s D.C. office:
Why did Senate conservatives have to negotiate with Ted Kennedy, the Democrats and the White House on any immigration proposal?
– The Democrats control both the House and Senate and have the votes to pass last year’s Kennedy bill or something worse that will grant amnesty and will not secure our borders.
– In the legislative process, no one gets 100 percent of what they want. This legislation represents the best opportunity that we have to secure our borders and address this problem.
– Some say we can not trust this White House or the Democrats to actually enforce the new bill. That will be true of any legislation, and that is why the Isakson border-security-first triggers are so important.
– We also have to consider what kind of bill we might get with a Democratic President (no border security, blanket amnesty, no enforcement and rights to all welfare benefits).
Will this proposal secure our borders and does it include the Isakson border-security-first trigger? Yes.
– This proposal would result in our borders being secure for the first time in our history.
– This proposal contains the Isakson border-security-first trigger exactly as Senator Johnny Isakson of Georgia drafted it. It says that no temporary worker program can begin until the Secretary of Homeland Security certifies to the President and to the Congress that specific key border security measures are funded, in place and operational.
– The border security measures that must be funded, in place and operational are:
* Manpower – A total of 18,000 full-time Border Patrol Agents.
* Detention beds – Detention facilities with a total capacity of 27,500 detention beds to end the practice of “catch and release.â€
*Barriers – Additional barriers such as 370 miles of fences and 70 underground sensor systems along the entire U.S.-Mexico border.
* Unmanned Aerial Vehicles — A squadron of at least four unmanned aerial vehicles with high-tech sensors and satellite communication to allow coverage on the border by an unmanned vehicle 24 hours a day.
*Biometrically secure ID – A biometrically secure identification card program so employers can instantly verify whether an immigrant is legal or illegal.
Does this proposal offer a new, special pathway for illegal immigrants to obtain U.S. citizenship or permanent residency? No.
– There is no new automatic pathway to citizenship, nor is there a new automatic path to establish permanent residency with a green card.
– Illegals must leave the country and must apply for a green card through a U.S. Embassy or Consulate outside the United States, just like everyone else, and they are placed at the back of the line. Everyone who has been waiting patiently on line will be ahead of them.
Does this proposal give amnesty to those who are here illegally? No.
– According to Black’s Law Dictionary, amnesty is the blanket pardon of an offense without penalty. This proposal is not amnesty because illegal workers must complete the following steps in order to obtain a probationary Z visa granting temporary, probationary legal status:
o Come forward within 18 months of the bill’s enactment
o Plead guilty to breaking the law and be placed on probation
o Pay an extensive fine and processing fee
o Undergo criminal background checks
o Prove they are employed
o Become proficient in English
– Workers approved for Z visas will be given a temporary probationary legal status, but they will be barred from the full privileges of citizens or Legal Permanent Residents, such as welfare benefits, Social Security benefits, and the ability to sponsor relatives abroad as immigrants.
– Workers who obtain Z visas must leave the country when they stop working.
What if someone here illegally does not come forward?
· Individuals who are here illegally have 18 months to come forward.
· If they do not come forward, they will be deported and permanently banned from the United States when they are caught.
· If they try to get a job, employers will ask for their biometrically secure identification cards, which they won’t have.
· If an employer hires an individual without a biometrically secure identification card, the employer will face extensive fines for each illegal immigrant that is employed.
Does this proposal allow illegal immigrants to immediately apply for a green card? No.
· Under this proposal, it will take most Z visa workers at least a decade to be eligible for a green card.
· After becoming eligible, Z visa workers must wait in line behind those who applied lawfully, pay penalties, fees, and fines, complete accelerated English requirements, leave the United States and file their application in their home country, and demonstrate merit based on the skills and attributes they will bring to the United States.
Does this proposal end “chain-migration� Yes.
– The immigration system would be reformed to better balance the importance of family connections with the economic needs of our country by replacing the current system, where nearly two-thirds of green cards are awarded to relatives of U.S. citizens, with a system in which future family immigration will focus on the nuclear family and parents.
– A new Parents Visitor visa is created to ensure that parents are allowed to visit their children in the United States regularly and for extended periods of time.
– The Diversity Lottery Program, which grants 50,000 green cards per year through random chance, is ended.
– These rebalanced green cards are used to clear the Family Backlog in eight years and then applied to the new Merit System for future immigration once the backlog is cleared.
Does the proposal create a new merit based system to select immigrants based upon what they contribute to the United States? Yes.
– The Proposal establishes a new merit-based system to select future immigrants based on the skills and attributes they will bring to the United States. A merit system is used by many other countries.
– Under the merit system, future immigrants applying to enter the United States will be assigned points for skills, education, employment background and other attributes that further our national interest. These skills include:
o Ability to speak English.
o Level of schooling, including added points for training in science, math, and technology.
o Job offer in a high-demand field.
o Work experience in the United States.
o Employer endorsement.
o Family ties to the United States.
Will Z visa workers be allowed to collect Social Security benefits?
– Z visa workers will pay into the Social Security system, as will their employers. Z visa workers may collect ONLY the share they individually put into the system and ONLY when they leave the United States. Z visa workers are barred from collecting the share of Social Security that employers put into the system on their behalf.
Won’t illegal immigrants simply come out of the shadows and on to the welfare rolls? No.
– Z visa workers are not entitled to welfare, Food Stamps, SSI, non-emergency Medicaid, or other programs and privileges enjoyed by U.S. citizens and some Legal Permanent Residents.
– In order to apply for and maintain Z visa status, workers must remain employed. If they are no longer working, they must leave the United States immediately.
Will Z visa workers be required to learn English and Civics? Yes.
– Probationary Z visa applicants must demonstrate a knowledge and understanding of the fundamentals of the history and of the principles and form of government of the United States, as well as be able to read, write, speak, and understand words in ordinary usage in the English language. They must prove this in a test prior to their first renewal of their probationary Z visa.
– The proposal also recognizes that English is the common language of the United States and that the Government of the United States shall preserve and enhance the role of English as the language of the United States of America.
– In addition, the DHS Office of Citizenship will be expanded to include coordinating assimilation efforts in its mission, and the Education Secretary will make an English instruction program freely available over the Internet.
Does this proposal repeat the mistakes of the 1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act? No.
The 1986 Act failed because it provided amnesty for 3 million immigrants, but did not secure our borders and did not include a workable employer verification system.
– This proposal addresses every one of the shortcomings from 1986:
o No Amnesty: Illegal workers must acknowledge that they broke the law and pay a fine to be eligible for a Z visa.
o Border Security: Border security benchmarks must be met before the Z visa and temporary worker programs go into effect. These triggers include: constructing 370 miles of fencing and 200 miles of vehicle barriers at the border and increasing the size of the Border Patrol to 18,000 agents.
o Employer Verification System: An Employment Eligibility Verification System must be ready to process new hires before the Z visa and temporary worker programs go into effect.
– The 1986 Act offered green cards after just 18 months, but under this proposal, green card applicants must meet so many responsibilities that it will take most candidates more than a decade to become eligible.
How will the government be able to meet its promise to crack down on the hiring of illegal workers?
– Before the Z visa and temporary worker programs go into effect, an Employment Eligibility Verification System (EEVS) must be in place and ready to prevent unauthorized workers from obtaining jobs in the United States.
– Employers will be required to verify the work eligibility of all employees using the EEVS, and all workers will be required to present stronger and more readily verifiable identification documents. Tough new anti-fraud measures will be implemented to restrict fraud and identity theft.
– Employers who hire illegal workers will face stiff new criminal and civil penalties. For example, the maximum criminal penalty for a pattern or practice of hiring illegals will increase 25-fold, from $3,000 per alien to $75,000 per alien.
Will the trigger period cause a rush to the border? No.
– To be eligible to apply for a Z visa, illegal immigrants must prove they were in the country prior to January 1, 2007. Those who cannot prove that will be deported immediately.
– Anyone caught crossing the border after the new law passes will be fingerprinted and permanently barred from entry to the U.S., creating a strong disincentive to illegal immigration.
Will government agencies be able to share information to pursue immigration violators? Yes.
– Under this proposal, there will be unprecedented information sharing between Federal, State, and local agencies to ensure that immigration laws are respected and enforced.
– The new Employment Eligibility Verification System, which employers will be required to use for all employees, will rely on unprecedented information sharing across Federal and State databases, including Social Security records, passport and visa records, and State driver’s licenses.
– For Z visa applicants, DHS has authority to share information with law enforcement about terrorist aliens, security risks, and criminal aliens, including aliens who lie on their applications and aliens who commit fraud.
– Under this proposal, DHS will receive Social Security Administration “no match” information on individuals and information on multiple uses of the same social security number by more than one individual.
Was this deal negotiated behind closed doors?
– Recognizing the diversity of thought in the Senate on this issue, the Senate Republican and Democratic Leadership, as well as the White House, convened a number of working groups to hear different views and ideas on how best to address this problem.
– A number of Senators representing different views on this issue participated in formulating a proposal.
– The next step is an open debate of this proposal on the Senate floor.
– Numerous articles in the press have chronicled the process to develop legislation over the past several months.
Will there be an opportunity to alter the language of this proposal, or is this the final version?
– During debate of this proposal on the Senate floor, there will be opportunity to offer amendments to change the language of the proposal.
– Senator Isakson looks forward to a floor debate in which all members of the Senate have a chance to offer amendments that they think would improve the bill.
Should we support a bill that contains 90 percent of what conservatives want?
– With a Democratic-controlled Congress, it is a victory that most of the principles that conservatives have been fighting for are contained in this proposal. Conservatives should see this as the best chance to secure the border and reform our immigration system using conservative principles.
– With the political uncertainty of the 2008 presidential election, this is our best shot at securing the border and reforming our immigration system with conservative principles.
– Conservatives should not allow the perfect to be the enemy of the good.
Is it true that illegal immigrants do not have to go home to be eligible for a Z visa?
– For now the bill does not force deportation of the estimated 12 to 20 million illegal immigrants who are here. While this is not ideal, the Democrats are not willing to force deportation, and they are in the majority.
– The proposal would force illegals to come forward within 18 months of the bill’s enactment and plead guilty to the crime of entering our country illegally, pay a fine and become proficient in English. If they fail to come forward, or fail to clear a background check, or fail to learn English, or fail to remain employed, or if they commit a second crime, they will be deported and permanently banned from the United States.
– Under the current proposal, workers who obtain Z visas would have to leave the country when they stopped working.
– However, this proposal is open to amendment in the Senate. When this proposal is debated on the Senate floor, Senator Isakson will work for and support any amendment that would require illegals to have to go home before they may obtain a Z visa.
Are conservatives united in their opposition to this proposal? No.
– Conservatives are NOT united in opposing this proposal. Those who have really looked at what the proposal contains realize that it includes most of the principles conservatives have been fighting for.
Is Senator Isakson a co-sponsor of this proposal? No.
– Senator Isakson is not a co-sponsor of this immigration proposal.
Will Senator Isakson vote in support of this immigration proposal?
– Senator Isakson has said he will reserve judgment on supporting the final bill until the debate is complete.
– He has said that at a minimum the bill must include his border-security-first triggers prohibiting implementation of a temporary, probationary work permit program until the Department of Homeland Security certifies to the President and to the Congress that the border security provisions in the immigration legislation are fully funded and operational.
– He also has said the bill must prohibit any new pathway to U.S. citizenship and must require illegal immigrants to return home and get in the back of the line to apply for citizenship just as everyone must do now.
May 22nd, 2007 at 9:43 pm
The press release is pretty funny. Isakson will do what the WH tells him to do. So will Chambliss.
May 25th, 2007 at 6:50 am
I’m glad there’s finally a comprehensive summary of the proposal. Up until now I had severe doubts. Now my doubts are limited to the enforcement of the bill’s provisions. My trust has been ground down.
June 4th, 2007 at 7:07 pm
Why must the Senate introduce an all-in-one bill which so complicates this isue to the point it is impossible to draft a bill that satisfies both Parties. Why not pass a simple bill quickly which definitly closes our borders and immediately deports any illegal found when arrested for a criminal act or such. Does the Congress of the United States not believe we need secure borders to keep our illegal immigrants and TERRORISTS ?
A bill regarding temporary visas etc. could then follow. Sounds easier doesn’t it?
June 16th, 2007 at 10:01 pm
Isakson has betrayed the people who elected him. There is so much wrong with this disastrous, economically and culturally catastrophic bill; I don’t care how much lipstick Isakson and the others try to put on it. Isakson is wrong — the bill can be stopped, but not if the Republicans cede their and our future to the Democrats and the special interests behind this bill.